It's just possible you may have seen this campaign for the iPhone.
It has apparently run in 70 cities and 24 countries, in magazines, newspapers, billboards, transit posters and more.
I attended some research groups the other day. The first question was "have you noticed any ads recently?" and the answer came back "Apple, Apple, Apple, Apple." Always Apple.
As well as its huge media spend and undoubtedly high impact and recall, it can't be considered too shabby from a creative point of view, since it won the Cannes Grand Prix for Outdoor this year.
But amidst all the hype, one aspect of the campaign has been overlooked.
The teeny weeny size of the logo.
Running a rough ruler over it, I calculate that the logo occupies only 0.12% of the total area of the ad you see above.
And yet the branding is super-clear.
Partly this is because there isn't any extraneous communication here, so there's not too much for the eye to wade through before it reaches the logo.
But mostly it's because the whole ad is an Apple ad, not just the part where the logo appears.
As I've argued before, branding should be in an ad's DNA, not slapped onto it like the branding on a cow.
That means each ad needs to be part of a consistent brand world. This is essential for proper attribution, and so that each ad contributes cumulatively to brand image, building a coherent picture in people's minds.
Apple have used a consistently clean and minimalist style for years - they have a brand world, for sure.
But assuming your brand has that - and it isn't a cheap & cheerful one where a big logo and starbursting price are appropriate - try to stand firm the next time someone asks you to "up the branding".
You could perhaps mention that the only brand in the world which has people camping out in the street to buy its latest product, uses a logo that's just 0.12% of the ad.